Comments on the blog

Posted by Helen Friday, May 12, 2006

While I have been remiss about keeping the blog as up to date as it ought to be (day job and the need to turn my attention to the forthcoming issue of the Journal – hint to contributors - interfering), there have been some very useful responses and comments on previous postings.

As to be expected, John Barnes has made points that are of interest to all of us. I shall pick up his response to the Churchill posting separately, as I should like to see a good discussion on the subject of that great man’s post-war premiership.

However, John has also written interestingly if all too briefly on the subject of Conservative women MPs. As I have said before, the autumn issue of the Journal will focus on women in the conservative movement, going back to the nineteenth century (and earlier, if anyone would wish to contribute on the subject) but certainly covering the enormous contribution women have made to the Conservative Party more recently.

Here are John Barnes’s comments on Conservative women MPs:

“I am struck by the fact that although 13 Conservative women were elected as MPs in 1931, they formed only 3 per cent of the party. Today 17 Conservative women MPs amount to 8 per cent of the party, a stable percentage figure for the last three elections.The second Conservative woman elected to the Commons was Mabel Philipson for Berwick-upon-Tweed (1923-29) and the Duchess of Atholl also entered the Commons in 1923. Obviously the Duchess is as famous as Nancy Astor and, unlike her, achieved office.

But does any one know anything of Mabel Philipson.The thirteen elected in 1931 include such formidable characters as Florence Horsburgh, Irene Ward, Mavis Tate, Thelma Cazalet and the Countess of Iveagh, and of course the Duchess of Atholl and Nancy Astor; but the remainder deserve documentation. They were Ida Copeland, Marjorie Graves, Mary Pickford, Norah Runge, Helen Shaw and Sally Ward.

Sally Ward, whom I knew when contesting Walsall North, lost her Cannock seat in 1935, but went on to have a career in local government, serving on the Staffordshire County Council, and becoming an Alderman. She was not very tall, but a feisty character and an excellent platform speaker. She was a farmer's wife, I believe. Perhaps others can and should document this early generation for the CHG. They deserve to be remembered.”
I couldn't agree more with the point that we need to pay more attention to all these remarkable women. What else is the Conservative History Group for?

2 comments

  1. Its important that successful Tory woman are remembered. One to encourage others, and secondly to dispel the myth that Labour is somehow better for females. Its never even been close to having a female leader + its always worth examining its post-war employment policies.

    In terms of inspiring right-wingers - wouldn't it be a shame not to mention Ayn Rand?

     
  2. It would, indeed, be a shame not to mention Ayn Rand but I am not sure how she can be fitted into conservative, as opposed to right-wing, history. There are other American women conservatives who would, I think, be more appropriate.

     
Powered by Blogger.

Followers

Labels

Counters




Blog Archive